BIG-IP ASM · Advanced WAF · L7 protection
120 scenario questions · 180 min · 70% Techclick practice target
⚠️ Exam Rules
| Questions in this Techclick bank | 120 |
|---|---|
| Timer | 180 min |
| Techclick practice target | 70% |
| Official exam code | F5-303 |
A team is enabling BIG-IP ASM for a web application and needs to attach the security policy at the correct object. Where should the ASM policy be associated for traffic to be inspected?
Correct: A. ASM is enforced per Virtual Server and requires an HTTP profile so the system can parse Layer 7 requests; the policy is attached directly or selected by an LTM policy. Routes and pool members are not policy attachment points because ASM inspects HTTP at the VS, not at network or backend layers, and the management interface carries administrative traffic, not application traffic.
During a maintenance window an administrator switches a newly built policy from Transparent to Blocking enforcement mode. What behavioral change should they expect for traffic matching blocking-enabled violations?
Correct: B. In Transparent mode ASM logs violations without enforcing, whereas Blocking mode acts on violations whose Block flag is enabled, returning the blocking page or resetting the connection. Logging continues in blocking mode, so that option is incorrect; enforcement mode does not control automatic learning, and signatures are not disabled by switching modes.
An architect is sizing an Advanced WAF deployment and evaluating where ASM can run across the BIG-IP portfolio. Which deployment statements about ASM placement are accurate? (Choose TWO)
Correct: A and B. vCMP guests each provision their own ASM, and hardware appliances accelerate TLS-heavy WAF workloads through crypto offload. ASM also runs on Virtual Edition, so the standalone-only claim is incorrect; policies live on the BIG-IP, not on pool members, and client traffic flows through the data plane, not the management plane, making those distractors wrong.
Two distinct applications share a single Virtual Server, and each needs different ASM tuning. What is the recommended way to apply separate ASM policies based on the requested host or URL?
Correct: B. An LTM policy (or URL-based policy switching) inspects request attributes such as Host or path and assigns the appropriate ASM policy, keeping per-application tuning isolated. A single merged policy weakens positive security, disabling ASM removes protection entirely, and adding hardware is unnecessary because one VS can serve multiple ASM policies.
A new public web application must get baseline WAF protection on day one with minimal manual tuning. Which built-in policy template best fits this requirement?
Correct: A. The Rapid Deployment policy applies attack signatures and DataGuard with sensible defaults, giving immediate negative-security coverage that you harden over time. An empty policy offers no protection, a SOAP template targets XML web services rather than general HTML apps, and no standard template permanently disables enforcement, so those options are incorrect.
Last updated:
Yes. You can start, finish and score it for free, and download the Techclick practice certificate.
This bank has 120 original scenario-based questions with a 180-minute timer and a 70% Techclick practice target.
The official exam code is F5-303 (F5).
No. They are original practice questions written by Techclick. This is not the vendor's official exam and not leaked dumps.
Score 70% or higher to get a Techclick practice certificate and LinkedIn badge. It is not an official F5 certification.
Related practice tests: F5 F5101, F5 F5201, F5 F5301, F5 F5-302, F5 F5-304 (linked below).

You earned it — let the world know!
