SQLi · XSS · Access Control · SSRF · Deserialization · JWT · Request Smuggling · Burp Repeater/Intruder/Collaborator
60 questions · 240 min · 70% Techclick practice target
⚠️ Exam Rules
| Questions in this Techclick bank | 60 |
|---|---|
| Timer | 240 min |
| Techclick practice target | 70% |
| Official exam code | BSCP |
During recon you map an application's attack surface. Burp's passive crawler found /admin returns 401, but a JavaScript file references the path /admin-panel-7f3a. After visiting it directly the page loads. Which Burp feature most directly helped you discover this hidden endpoint?
Correct: A. Client-side JavaScript often references endpoints that are not linked from rendered HTML; Burp surfaces these in the site map and shows where each item was linked from. Sequencer analyses token randomness, Collaborator captures OOB interactions, and the Host header is unrelated to path discovery.
An application returns a verbose stack trace when you submit a malformed parameter: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error ... org.apache.struts2.dispatcher... at com.acme.shop.OrderServlet.java:142 What is the primary value of this information disclosure to an attacker?
Correct: A. Verbose errors leak the framework (Struts/Java) and class names, letting an attacker fingerprint the stack and choose technology-specific attacks. A stack trace alone does not prove SQLi, cookie flags, or WAF state.
You want to find files and directories that are not linked anywhere in the app. Which approach using Burp is most appropriate for content discovery without an external wordlist tool?
Correct: A. Burp's 'Discover content' engagement tool performs recursive content discovery using built-in and learned wordlists. Sequencer, Comparer and Decoder serve token analysis, response diffing and encoding respectively.
While fingerprinting a target you want to identify the technology stack and possible WAF. Which TWO signals are reliable indicators worth recording during recon? (Choose TWO)
Correct: A and B. Server/X-Powered-By headers, cookie names and framework default paths reliably fingerprint the stack. CPU model, colour scheme and footer word count carry no security-relevant fingerprint value.
A login form responds differently for valid vs invalid usernames: Invalid user → 'Invalid username' Valid user, wrong password → 'Incorrect password' Which attack does this design directly enable, and which Burp tool best automates it?
Correct: A. Distinct error messages let an attacker enumerate valid usernames; Intruder automates the wordlist and flags differing responses by length or content. The other options describe unrelated attacks.
Last updated:
Yes. You can start, finish and score it for free, and download the Techclick practice certificate.
This bank has 60 original scenario-based questions with a 240-minute timer and a 70% Techclick practice target.
The official exam code is BSCP (PortSwigger).
No. They are original practice questions written by Techclick. This is not the vendor's official exam and not leaked dumps.
Score 70% or higher to get a Techclick practice certificate and LinkedIn badge. It is not an official PortSwigger certification.
Use the PortSwigger practice exams page (linked above) to pick the next practice test in the same track.

You earned it — let the world know!
